4월 4주차

human-computer interaction-point- People often interact with media technologies as though the technologies were people.related ideas1. Clifford and Nash, “the media equation”2. Freud, transference–see also Sherry Turkle on computers as “second selves” and as “evocative objects”3. surrealists, “automatic writing” (recall Tristan Tzara’s “recipe”)4. Mannheim/Schutz/Garfinkel, the “documentary method”there are three parts of the related pointhow should we treat technologies~~~.how should we treat ohters? -1. like us2. radically differentwhat makes believe someone or something is alive, thinking, or simply the same as us?questions of aesthetics, goals and intentionsdo objects, technologies and natural phenomena have goals and intentions?or, do they just look like they have goals and intentions?it is a little bit confusing.1. If we view objects, technologies and natural phenomenon as if they do, in fact, have goals and intentions, then we will design like an artificial intelligence researcher2. If we view objects, technologies and natural phenomenon as if the just look like they have goals and intentions, then we will design like a tool builder for human “users” or “operators” ofour tools.as we learned history of HCI as tools : people.(people)Vannevar Bush: memexJ.C.R. Licklider: computer networking, agentsIvan Sutherland: sketchpadDoug Engelbart: mouse, GUI, word processing, etc.Ted Nelson: hypertextAlan Kay: object-oriented programming, laptops etc,(systems)–Memex: 1945 (concept)–Sketchpad 1963–NLS (oNLine System) - 1963-68–Xerox Alto 1972, Xerox Star 1981------------------------------>terminal??mainframe---connetct----------the other computer.–Apple Lisa 1983, Mac 1984, NeXT 1988–Macintosh Powerbook 1991–WWW ~1994(funding)–Military: Navy, Air Force, ARPA, DARPA–Universities: MIT, Stanford, CMU, UC–Government: National Science Foundation 1950-now –Companies: Xerox PARC: 1970-now, Apple – NeXT–simple example..using webcam ------>we can control delay and bold from trace.where does HCI meet AI?--basic design question: should the computer act like a person?agents versus “direct manipulation”even “direct-manipulation” interfaces are based on a “conversation” metaphor: the computer responds immediately to each action or command from the “user” ->....>it depends on circumstance.two models of conversation1. –information/intention transmission2.–co-construction of meaningwe saw a movie.---and we could learn frome them.–lesson from “Sleeper”1) Reliability2) Personalization3) if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it4) intuitive UI design@@question for today@@what problem does Weizenbaum’s ELIZA system address or solve?–the artificial intelligence answer: it does (or does not) behave like a human and is therefore successful (or not successful)–the ethnomethodology answer: it is taken to be a like a person in a conversation and thus simply works like most other technologies in a social situation.-------->computer doesn't count on us!!!Johnstone’s “algorithm”--->there are some rules on the conversation.ethnomethodology: a definitionEthnomethodology simply means the study of the ways in which people make sense of their social world.Ethnomethodology is a fairly recent sociological perspective, founded by the American sociologist Harold Garfinkel in the early 1960s. The main ideas behind it are set out in his book "Studies in EthnomethodologyEthnomethodology differs from other sociological perspectives in one very important respectEthnomethodologists assume that social order is illusory.They believe that social life merely appears to be orderly; in reality it is potentially chaotic. For them social order is constructed in the minds of social actors as society confronts the individual as a series of sense impressions and experiences which she or he must somehow organize into a coherent pattern.-Lucy Suchmanshe is one of the primary people working in the fields of participatory design (pd) and computer-supported cooperative workHow do people make sense of the world????---------->!!“documentary method"!!The method consists of treating an actual appearance as ‘the document of,’ as ‘pointing to,’ as ‘standing on behalf of’ a presupposed underlying pattern. The method is recognizable for the everyday necessities of recognizing what a person is ‘talking about’ given that he does not say exactly what he means, or in recognizing such common occurrences and objects as mailmen, friendly gestures, and promisescONcULSION- As for that I could learn the new terminology.- documentary method and Ethnomethodology. but its a little bit difficult for me to understand. so i'm tying to configure them

4월 2주차

In this week, we learned about 'Artificial Intelligence'.We knew a person, Alan Turing, who was known as founder of computer science, artificial intelligence, mathematician, philosopher, codebreaker, and a gay man.He dead early by suicide but he leave many works. one of them is imitation game.It is game to guess sex by only text. The result is exciting. No one predicts his/her sex only text. Turing thinks man acquired sex by environment. He says that gender. Gender is changed anytime. The second imitation game is that. Who is man or machine by text as before . The result is same too. So he thinks that Can MACHINE do think??Marvin Minsky define AI as the science of making machines do things that would require intelligence as if done by humans.AI have many research areas : Knowledge Representation,Programming Languages,Natural Language (e.g., Story) Understanding,Speech Understanding, Vision, Robotics, Machine Learning, Planning etc.AI is planning as a technical problem. GPS is what is known in AI as a “planner.” GPS required that a full and accurate model of the “state of the world” AI planning have a problem. Because it was always accurate and that all of the significant details of the world could be modeled and followed, it was incorporated into most AI programs for decades and resulted in what became known to the AI community as the “frame problem"problems with story generation is missing common sense. for example Schizophrenia can be dis-functional.ELIZA is A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine, by J. Weizenbaum.

4월 1주차

April 1st homework

this month is start of real spring. and i wrote my homework freshly.

this weak we read the opinion and waw media.


barry wellman, computer networks as social networks
danah boyd, friendster and publicly articulated social networking
ze frank, small world [video]

i always think myself. i don't read carefully assignment. actually when i was read the assignment so difficult to me . somethime's very easy assignment is read and understood quickly. so this weak assignment was very easy to me.

recently we having a own computer and blog or cyworld. and cyworld system is coreect for this weak subject.

today's 화두 is connecting. human making with social socieaty. if human living a alone world he is not a human like a intellectual animal.

When technologies connect or separate people, they become media. past computer technologies is just programing and programing and play game alone. however technology is improve we use internet every body people. and express own feeling and other's feeling talking about deeply. like a real space. and 2000's era people make a own homepage's and 2004'~ and present. people use a myspace and cyworld.

own hompage and cyworld is same system but few diffrent. cyworld has a line of personal contact. cyworld make a system ' 1촌. 1촌 means a line of personal contact. people make a 1촌 and group other's homepage's. finally making a line of personal contact group gradually. look at the down picture. it like a real space.

New media technologies usually reinforce existing social networks or even work to isolate people.
isolated people making a cywolrd and going many time . this people making a many cyber space people. finally this people having a cyber space toxicosis . and not dividing real space and cyber space. technologies giving a many merit for us . however technologies holic is very danger. however cyberspace is seeing perfect. we are not npc . we are the human. many pople take care of next people.~!